Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 394 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M30's 82.4 general score. The Moto G200 5G design is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy M30's, but it is just a little thicker and heavier. These phones use Android OS, but the Moto G200 5G has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Moto G200 5G has a bit better performance than Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Moto G200 5G features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a just a bit greater pixel amount per inch of screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2460px resolution and a quite bigger display.
Motorola Moto G200 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Galaxy M30 has a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy M30 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G200 5G's battery duration is just as good as the battery lifetime in Galaxy M30.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.