Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-03-07 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30 has an overall score of 82.4, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's score of 76.4. Galaxy M30's construction is newer, but thicker and just a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a CPU that's just as good as the processor in Samsung Galaxy M30, although the Moto Z Force Droid Edition has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little bit better memory for games and applications than Galaxy M30, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy M30 counts with a very superior battery duration than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition captures a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a way higher (4K) video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.