Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 394 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30 has a global score of 82.4, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper's overall score of 79.8. Galaxy M30's body is lighter and just a little thinner than the Motorola One Hyper, even though it was released just 9 months before. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M30 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11.
Motorola One Hyper has a little better performance than Galaxy M30, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola One Hyper and Galaxy M30 both count with really similar displays, although the Motorola One Hyper also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little bit larger display and a little higher screen density.
The Motorola One Hyper takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola One Hyper also has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a lot more MP camera. Motorola One Hyper has a slightly better memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 features improved battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.