Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-03-07 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 394 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30 has an overall score of 82.4, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Vision's overall score of 80.7. Even though Galaxy M30 and Motorola One Vision were released only 2 months apart, Galaxy M30 is just a little bit lighter and a bit thinner. Motorola One Vision has just a little better processing power than Galaxy M30, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola One Vision counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better count of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better 1080 x 2520px resolution. Motorola One Vision counts with as much storage capacity to install games and applications as Galaxy M30, both have an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB and exactly the same internal memory.
Motorola One Vision takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy M30, because it has a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos and a larger aperture for better low light captures and video.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.