Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M30, getting an 87 score against 82.4. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although Motorola razr (2020) is just a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy M30, it's a little thinner and newer.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy M30 has a little sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit higher 1080 x 2280 resolution, a bit better pixel amount per inch in the display and a quite larger screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy M30, because it has a way higher resolution back-facing camera, a way larger back-facing camera sensor, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 features just a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M30 counts with a much better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.