Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-07 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30 has a general score of 82.4, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. Both of these phones come with the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system. The Galaxy M30 is a lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although they were released only a couple months apart.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a quite bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a bigger camera aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments, a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S's battery duration is very similar to Galaxy M30's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.