Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-03-07 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is better than Samsung Galaxy M30's 82.4 score. Galaxy A52's design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy M30, but it is a bit heavier. Galaxy A52 has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a just a little higher screen density, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little bit better storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy M30. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy M30 features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs, a way higher video quality and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.