Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy M30, having a general score of 91.3 against 82.4. Galaxy A52 5G's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy M30, but it's just a little bit heavier. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version while Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better screen than Galaxy M30, because it has a bit larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little greater amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy M30. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy M30, because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a lot better (4K) video quality and a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Galaxy M30 features a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.