Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 394 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is better than Samsung Galaxy M30's global score of 82.4. The Galaxy A71 5G UW construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy M30, but it's just a little heavier. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a quite inferior count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger screen.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy M30 counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy M30, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video resolution, a back camera with much more mega-pixels, a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality photographs and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.