Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy M30's overall score of 82.4. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy M30, but it's heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better screen than Galaxy M30, because it has a little larger screen, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot better camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a much larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures, a camera in the back with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy M30 has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.