Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-03-07 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M30's 82.4 score. The Galaxy Note10 is a a little thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy M30, even though both were released with only a couple of months difference. Galaxy Note10 has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, the Galaxy Note10 also counts with a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy M30 features just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy M30 features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43% more battery capacity. The Galaxy Note10 shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy M30, because although it has a camera with lesser MP resolution, it also counts with a lot better video resolution, a way larger camera aperture and a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.