Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-07 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M30's score of 82.4. Even when Samsung Galaxy S10 and Samsung Galaxy M30 were released only 0 months apart, Samsung Galaxy S10 is just a bit lighter and a little thinner. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S10 counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 has a brighter display than Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a higher pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy M30 and Samsung Galaxy S10 count with very similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, they have equal internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low light situations and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 features a way better battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.