Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-07 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy M30, having a global score of 93.6 against 82.4. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though Galaxy S10 5G and Samsung Galaxy M30 were released only 2 months apart, the Galaxy S10 5G body is heavier but also just a little thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a camera with lesser megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality, a lot larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M30 features just a little better battery life than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.