Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy M30's overall score of 82.4. Samsung Galaxy S20 is a newer phone, and it's also just a little thinner and a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy M30. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has the older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a higher display pixels density.
Galaxy S20 has a superior camera than Galaxy M30, because although it has a camera with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher video definition. Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little bit better storage for apps and games than Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy M30 features better battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.