Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M30, getting a score of 98 against 82.4. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy M30, although it is incredibly heavier and just a bit thicker.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy M30, because it has a better display density, a little larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a lot higher resolution back camera, a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot higher video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy M30 and Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G both count with similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.