Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-07 | -- |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.14 ounces | -- |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy M30's general score of 82.4. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 has an older 14 version while Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S25 construction is notably thinner and incredibly lighter than Samsung Galaxy M30.
Galaxy S25 has a much better screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340. Samsung Galaxy M30 features a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S25 features a greater camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy M30 features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M30 also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M30 features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.