Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-07 | -- |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.14 ounces | -- |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M30, having a general score of 90.7 against 82.4. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra body is a lot lighter and much thinner than Samsung Galaxy M30.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a better amount of pixels per inch in the display, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a quite larger display. The Galaxy M30 has a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy M30 features a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a battery life that is just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy M30. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a way bigger sensor, a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.