Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than Samsung Galaxy M30's score of 82.4. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is newer and thinner than Samsung Galaxy M30's, although it's a little bit heavier. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better screen than Galaxy M30, because it has a bit bigger screen, a little bit greater pixel amount per inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy M30, because although it has a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light situations and a bigger sensor shooting better quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy M30 counts with a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M30 features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.