Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Galaxy M30, having a 94.6 score against 82.4. These devices use Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version and Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Galaxy M30, but it is also a lot heavier.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a larger display and a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better camera than Galaxy M30, because although it has a lesser megapixels camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments, a lot larger sensor capturing much higher quality photos and a much higher video definition.
The Galaxy M30 features a bit more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M30 features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.