Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-07 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy M30's overall score of 82.4. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an older 10 version and Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie. Although it's the best we compare here, we must tell that it's also a just a little thicker and a little heavier phone.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite better number of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy M30 counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy M30 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy M30. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy M30, because it has a larger aperture for better low light captures and video, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a lot better (4K) video definition and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 has superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.