Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Green | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M33 is just a bit better than Apple iPhone XS, getting a score of 86.3 against 84.2. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy M33 is a somewhat thicker and heavier cellphone than the Apple iPhone XS. IPhone XS counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy M33, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixels density and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
The Galaxy M33 counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. Apple iPhone XS has a little better performance than Galaxy M33, because although it has lesser cpu cores (but faster) and 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XS features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M33, although it has a back camera with a way lower resolution, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. Galaxy M33 features a much better battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has an 88 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.