Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Green | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 400 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M33 is better than HTC One M9, getting a global score of 86.3 against 77.7. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M33 has the newer 12 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. Galaxy M33's construction is a bit thinner but extremely heavier than HTC One M9.
HTC One M9 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy M33, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processor. The HTC One M9 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy M33, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixel density.
The HTC One M9 takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M33, although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video. Galaxy M33 features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M33 has a way better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 76% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.