Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Green | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M33 is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, having an 86.3 score against 81.3. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, Galaxy M33's construction is extremely heavier and noticeably thicker than the LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M33, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M33. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy M33, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M33, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less MP, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photography and videos. The Galaxy M33 has a much longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.