Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Green | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy M33's 86.3 global score. LG Velvet's design is thinner and a little bit lighter than the Galaxy M33. LG Velvet and Galaxy M33 both count with very similar displays, because although the LG Velvet has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2460px resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The LG Velvet's processor is just as good as the Galaxy M33 one, both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM. LG Velvet counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M33, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy M33 counts with superior battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 16 percent more battery capacity. LG Velvet counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M33, although it has a lower resolution camera in the back, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.