Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Green | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M33 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A50, having an 86.3 score against 83.8. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy M33 is a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the Galaxy A50. The Galaxy A50 and Galaxy M33 both count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy A50 has a quite smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels density.
Galaxy M33 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy M33 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A50 has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M33, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A50 takes clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M33, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures. Galaxy M33 counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.