Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Green | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy M33's general score of 86.3. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M33 has Android 12, providing you some nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a just a bit heavier but thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy M33.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy M33, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M33, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a quite greater pixel density and a little bigger display.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has much more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy M33, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy M33 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M33, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.