Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Green | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M33 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, with a overall score of 86.3 against 79.3. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy M33 has the newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. The Galaxy M33 is a heavier and somewhat thicker phone than Samsung Galaxy Note 5.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a sharper display than Galaxy M33, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater pixel amount per inch in the display. The Galaxy M33 has a superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
The Galaxy Note 5 features a bit better camera than Galaxy M33, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video and a lot worse resolution back camera. Samsung Galaxy M33 features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy M33 features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.