Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Green | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than the Galaxy M33, with a score of 98 against 86.3. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is just a little bit thinner but somewhat heavier than the Galaxy M33. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and Galaxy M33 has Android 12 version, counting with some nice extra features.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M33, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M33, because it has a bit larger screen, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M33, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery performance is just as good as Samsung Galaxy M33's battery life. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy M33, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.