Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-18 | -- |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M40 is a bit better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), having an 85 score against 82.2. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M40 has the older 10 version while Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14. Galaxy M40 features a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Galaxy M40 counts with a much powerful processor than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy M40 has a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy M40 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 43 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.