Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M40, with a global score of 85.4 against 85. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 operating system, so both of them should offer the same operating system features. Although the LG K92 is newer than the Samsung Galaxy M40, it is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker.
LG K92 and Galaxy M40 both feature really similar CPUs, both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy M40 has a little more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density.
The LG K92 has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG K92 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy M40, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
The LG K92 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting images in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a much bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.