Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than Galaxy M40, with an 87.6 score against 85. The LG V60 ThinQ body is newer than the Galaxy M40's, but it's a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but LG V60 ThinQ has newer 11 version and Galaxy M40 has Android 10 version.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG V60 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy M40 feature similar screens, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a bit worse count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite larger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy M40, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy M40, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy M40 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lot lower 3840x2160 video resolution, a much smaller back camera sensor taking much lower quality photos and videos and a way worse 32 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.