Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M40 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a general score of 85 against 81.9. Although the Galaxy M40 is noticeably older than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it's construction is a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy M40 has older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
Galaxy M40 features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1256 x 2760px, a bit higher display density and a bit larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos and a way higher 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy M40 features a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.