Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-06-18 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M40 is much better than the Moto Z Force, getting an 85 score against 75.8. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy M40 has older 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Although Galaxy M40 is extremely newer than the Moto Z Force, it is just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier.
Galaxy M40 counts with a bit better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has more processing cores (although slower) and more RAM memory. The Moto Z Force counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy M40 features a little bit better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy M40 also has a larger aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Moto Z Force features a little bit better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M40, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force features a battery performance that is just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy M40.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.