Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-18 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M40 is much better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting an 85 score against 76.4. Samsung Galaxy M40's body is way newer than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, but it is just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Galaxy M40 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM memory.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little more vivid display than Galaxy M40, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a battery performance that is just as good as the battery life in Galaxy M40. Galaxy M40 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy M40 also has a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.