Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M40 is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2, with a score of 85 against 79.7. The Samsung Galaxy M40 design has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2, but it's lighter. These phones work with the same Android 10 operating system. The OPPO Find X2 has a little better processing power than Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen, a better 1440 x 3168px resolution and a quite larger display. The OPPO Find X2 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy M40, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 also has faster video frame rates, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy M40 features a little bit better memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Find X2 counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.