Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M40 is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a general score of 85 against 77.7. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system). Galaxy M40's design is just a bit lighter than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it's a little bit thicker and was released around 11 months before.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy M40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has 6 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos.
The Galaxy M40 counts with a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. OPPO Find X2 Neo features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.