Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy M40's global score of 85. Galaxy S22's construction is much newer, just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Galaxy M40. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version while Galaxy M40 has Android 10, offering lots of additional features.
Galaxy S22 counts with an incredibly better display than Galaxy M40, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Samsung Galaxy M40 has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy M40 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S22 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy M40, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Galaxy S22 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way higher video definition, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a much larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.