Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-18 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Plastic | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M40 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, getting a general score of 85 against 82.2. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). The Galaxy M40 is a somewhat thinner and lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, even though they were released only 0 months apart.
Xiaomi Mi 9T features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a just a little worse display density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a little bit bigger display. Galaxy M40 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy M40 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has just a little better processing power than Galaxy M40. They have 8 cpu cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size. Xiaomi Mi 9T takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M40, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.