Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy M51, having a 92.8 score against 87.7. IPhone 12 Pro is a somewhat lighter and notably thinner phone than Galaxy M51, although they were released only a few months apart. The iPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy M51 works with Android 10 operating system.
The iPhone 12 Pro features a faster processor than Galaxy M51, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM, the iPhone 12 Pro also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution and a just a bit greater display pixels density.
Galaxy M51 features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone 12 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy M51 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a superior camera than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
The Galaxy M51 has a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 149% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.