Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro Max has a global score of 93.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy M51's 87.7 global score. Even though the iPhone 12 Pro Max and Galaxy M51 were released only 2 months apart, the iPhone 12 Pro Max construction is a little bit heavier but incredibly thinner than Galaxy M51. IPhone 12 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy M51 counts with Android 10 OS.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a better processor than Galaxy M51, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processor. IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a same size screen, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also has a bit better pixel count per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels.
Galaxy M51 features a superior camera than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a way better 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy M51 counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M51 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 3687mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.