Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is a bit better than the Galaxy M51, with a general score of 88.1 against 87.7. The Apple iPhone X is an way older device than Galaxy M51, but Apple was able to make it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. The iPhone X counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a little greater pixel amount in each inch of display.
Apple iPhone X features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has lesser cores (but faster) and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone X, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a very superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 158% bigger battery capacity. Galaxy M51 features a better camera than iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a much bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.