Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is a bit better than the Apple iPhone XR, with a global score of 87.7 against 82. The Galaxy M51 design is newer than the Apple iPhone XR's, although it is a little heavier and somewhat thicker. The iPhone XR has a little sharper display than Galaxy M51, although it has a little smaller display, a quite worse amount of pixels per inch of display and a lot lower resolution of 828 x 1792.
Galaxy M51 has a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The iPhone XR features a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM and 2 lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy M51 features a very superior battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.