Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3, with a score of 87.7 against 80. The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a newer device than Google Pixel 3, although it is somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. The Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy M51 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M51, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 140% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy M51 features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same aperture, the Galaxy M51 also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.