Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL, having an 87.7 score against 80.7. The Galaxy M51 design is newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel 3 XL. Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a superior storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and more internal memory. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M51, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 104% more battery size. Samsung Galaxy M51 captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.