Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-11 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is much better than Google Pixel 3a, with an 87.7 score against 78.8. Galaxy M51's design is newer, but thicker and extremely heavier than the Google Pixel 3a. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11. The Google Pixel 3a has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2220px, it also counts with a just a little greater display density.
Galaxy M51 has a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy M51 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy M51 shoots greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M51 also has a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy M51 features a much greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 133 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.