Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4, getting an 87.7 score against 81.9. The Galaxy M51 design is newer than the Google Pixel 4's, but it is a lot heavier and thicker. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better CPU than Galaxy M51. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Google Pixel 4 has a bit better display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixel amount per screen inch. Galaxy M51 features much more memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.