Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, getting a overall score of 87.7 against 82.9. The Galaxy M51 design is newer than the Google Pixel 4 XL's, although it's just a bit heavier and thicker. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M51. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy M51 features a way better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy M51 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 89% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.