Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a bit better than Google Pixel 4a, with an 87.7 score against 82.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M51 is better than Google Pixel 4a, we must highlight that it's also a thicker and way heavier phone. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version while Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy M51 and Google Pixel 4a feature incredibly similar CPUs, both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy M51 features a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 123% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.