Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M51, having an 89 score against 87.7. Although Google Pixel 5 and Samsung Galaxy M51 were only released 1 months apart, Google Pixel 5 is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner. Google Pixel 5 has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a little better pixels quantity in each screen inch.
Galaxy M51 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M51 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 5 has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy M51 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos in poorly lited situations and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a back camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution and a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.