Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is better than the Honor 50 Pro, with an 87.7 score against 77. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy M51 has the previous 10 version while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11. Even being the best in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also older, somewhat heavier and thicker.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Honor 50 Pro also has a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a slightly better 1236 x 2676 pixels resolution. Galaxy M51 has a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Honor 50 Pro features just a bit better performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Honor 50 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking photographs in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy M51 counts with a really longer battery duration than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.